Pupil Premium
Pupil premium strategy statement- St Katharine’s Knockholt CE Primary School
This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium (and recovery premium) funding for the 2024 to 2025 academic year, to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged pupils.
It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding in this academic year and the effect that last year’s spending of pupil premium had within our school.
School overview
Detail |
Data |
School name |
St Katharine’s Knockholt CEPS |
Number of pupils in school |
175 |
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils |
9.7% 17 pupils |
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers |
2021-2022 to 2024-2025 |
Date this statement was published |
December 2024 |
Date on which it will be reviewed |
September 2025 |
Statement authorised by |
Sarah-Jane Tormey & Xanthe Veneziani (Headteachers) |
Pupil premium lead |
Nikki Bridel (Assistant Head & SENCO) |
Governor / Trustee lead |
Doreen Jones, (Lead for Disadvantaged Pupils) |
Funding overview
Detail |
Amount |
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year |
£17,370 |
Pupil premium funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable) |
£0 |
Total budget for this academic year
|
£17,370 |
Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan
The pupil premium is allocated to schools for children of statutory school age from low-income families who are known to be eligible for Free School Meals (FSM), to children who have been looked after continuously for more than six months (LAC), to children previously looked after and now adopted (PLAC) and to children whose parents are serving in the armed forces (Service Children). This will also include pupils eligible for FSM at any point in the last six years (known as the Ever 6 FSM measure). Schools are free to spend the pupil premium for the purposes of diminishing the attainment gap of the vulnerable. However, pupil premium is not ring-fenced to support eligible pupils only. We are held accountable for how we have used the additional funding to support pupils from low-income families and the impact this has.
Statement of intent
|
Challenges
This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.
Challenge number |
Detail of challenge |
1 |
Some Pupil Premium pupils are not yet making good progress in line with their peers. |
2 |
Some PP pupils without SEN/D are not working at age-related expectations due to gaps in reading, writing, maths and phonics. |
3 |
Some PP pupils experience lower levels of well-being as indicated by teacher assessment and pupil self-assessment using Leuvan Scales of well-being. |
4 |
Some PP pupils have experienced adverse childhood experiences which result in difficulties in being ready to learn. |
5 |
Some PP pupils have lower levels of attendance than their peers. |
6 |
Some PP children do not access a broad range of culture and experiences and have reduced access to resources for learning. |
Intended outcomes
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
Intended outcome |
Success criteria |
PP pupils have access to high-quality evidence-based interventions, alongside strong quality first teaching |
PP pupils will make strong measurable progress in their interventions, closing the gap between themselves and their peers |
PP pupils without SEN/D will reach at least age-related expectations at the end of the academic year. |
PP pupils without SEN/D will reach at least age-related expectations in reading, writing and maths in line with their peers. |
PP pupils with SEN/D will make progress towards their agreed outcomes. |
PP pupils with SEN/D achieve their short-term targets and progress towards their agreed outcomes. |
Social and emotional needs of PP pupils are met through a range of strategies and provision including: • Playtime support or nurture. • Internal wellbeing support through a range of programmes or personalised support provided by our two Emotional Literacy Support Assistants (ELSAs) • External wellbeing support through counselling. |
PP pupils with social &/or emotional needs will be able to independently implement strategies taught within those sessions to reduce anxiety, raise levels of wellbeing, attendance, and punctuality. |
All teaching staff will be aware of the impact of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and how to support adopted, fostered and troubled pupils to settle and learn through attachment awareness and trauma informed practices. |
All staff will have an increased understanding of ACEs and their impact on upon a child. They will be using some attachment aware and trauma informed practises to help sooth children’s regulation systems so that the children can engage more effectively with learning. |
Attendance |
|
To achieve and sustain improved attendance for all pupils, particularly our disadvantage pupils |
Attendance for all PP children will be good. |
Access to Resources and Experiences |
|
Pupils will be exposed to a wide range of social/cultural and sporting experiences Funding will be made available to those requiring financial support. |
All pupils will participate in residential visits and school trips. |
Activity in this academic year
This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium funding) this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
Teaching (for example, CPD, recruitment and retention)
Budgeted cost: £800
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
Continued professional development to improve standards of writing by focusing on increasing children’s autonomy and awareness of how they learn - their metacognition. Embed “The Write Stuff” approach within the school. |
Evidence suggests the use of ‘metacognitive strategies’ – which get pupils to think about their own learning – can be worth the equivalent of an additional +7 months’ progress when used well. Metacognition and Self-regulated Learning | EEF (educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk)
|
1, 2 |
The embedding of the Spelling Shed scheme across KS2. Focusing on orthography, morphology and etymology of words, to improve the speed & accuracy of spelling of extensive vocabulary & increase fluency of writing. |
EEF- Improving Literacy in KS2 Guidance states: ‘Fast and accurate spelling of an extensive vocabulary is a key component of writing fluency. Many of the skills that support word reading will also support spelling, but spelling demands great specificity and has different motor demands. There is limited high quality evidence about how to teach spelling, but it is clear that spelling should be actively taught rather than tested. The report goes on to identify the most common spelling errors as being phonological, orthographical, or morphological. |
1, 2 |
Staff training to support the introduction of White Rose Maths, to accelerate progress through mastery learning in Maths across the school. |
The EEF toolkit suggests that mastery learning accelerates progress. Work is challenging and is particularly effective when pupils work in groups and take responsibility for supporting each other’s progress:
https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/guidance-reports/early-maths
|
1, 2 |
Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)
Budgeted cost: £9,250
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
Additional phonics sessions targeted at disadvantaged pupils who require further phonics support. |
Phonics approaches have a strong evidence base indicating a positive impact on pupils, particularly from disadvantaged backgrounds. Targeted phonics interventions have been shown to be more effective when delivered as regular sessions over a period up to 12 weeks: Phonics | Toolkit Strand | Education Endowment Foundation | EEF
|
1, 2 |
Booster groups & personalised intervention |
Research which focuses on teaching assistants who provide one to one or small group targeted interventions shows a stronger positive benefit of between four and six additional months on average. Often interventions are based on a clearly specified approach which teaching assistants have been trained to deliver. Teachers also report the benefits in terms of workload and reduced stress from working with teaching assistants. In England, positive effects have been found in studies where teaching assistants deliver high-quality structured interventions which deliver short sessions, over a finite period, and link learning to classroom teaching. Special Educational Needs in Mainstream Schools | EEF (educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk) Teaching Assistant Interventions | EEF (educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk) |
1, 2 |
Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)
Budgeted cost: £7,320
Activity |
Evidence that supports this approach |
Challenge number(s) addressed |
Emotional, Literacy, Support Assistant
|
Social and emotional learning - Improves interaction with others and self -management of emotions – impacts on attitudes to learning and social relationships in school, which increases progress in attainment. Teaching and Learning Toolkit (educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk) |
3, 4, 5 |
Lunchtime support |
Social and emotional learning- additional lunchtime TA support on playground to enable effective play and behaviour support. Teaching and Learning Toolkit (educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk) |
3, 4, 5 |
Enrichment/ Cultural capital |
Achievement and enrichment for all- possible music, sports lessons additional to core school provision. Closing the gap with the new primary national curriculum Final report V2 (publishing.service.gov.uk) Learning is contextualised in concrete experiences and language-rich environments. Ofsted research (2019) places emphasis on improving cultural capital, particularly for disadvantaged pupils. Pupil surveys reflect greater enjoyment and engagement in school. Enrichment activities offer children a context for leaning and a stimulus to trigger their interest which can be evidenced in pupil books and data. |
3, 6 |
Financial Hardship |
Rowntree Foundation- Uniform purchases, support in payments for educational visits and wider curriculum activities. The impact of poverty on young children's experience of school (basw.co.uk) |
3, 6 |
Total budgeted cost: £17,370
Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year
Pupil premium strategy outcomes
This details the impact that our pupil premium activity had on pupils in the 2023 to 2024 academic year.
Headlines:
Provision & Impact: We have analysed the performance of our school’s disadvantaged pupils during the previous academic year, drawing on national assessment data and our own internal summative and formative assessments. As a school with few disadvantaged pupils, we must always reflect on what the data is showing us, but also be mindful of how smaller numbers can skew percentages. 41.2% of Disadvantaged Pupils at St Katharine’s Knockholt in the Year 2023-2024, also had SEND. 1. Attainment of our disadvantaged pupils at end of KS2 in relation to achieving the ‘Expected Standards’ in Statutory National Assessments 2024:
2. Achievement of ALL our disadvantaged pupils in relation to achieving ‘Age-Related Expectations’- Internal tracking end of the academic year 2023-2024:
The data demonstrated that the achievement of all our disadvantaged pupils in relation to achieving age-related expectations was up in Reading from 60% the previous year, to 70.6%. Achievement in Writing was up from 20% the previous year, to 47.1%. Achievement in Maths was up from 60% the previous year, to 70.6%.
3. Achievement of our disadvantaged pupils with no SEN in relation to achieving ‘Age-Related Expectation’- Internal tracking end of the academic year 2023-2024:
Our data for the achievement of disadvantaged pupils with no SEND in relation to achieving age-related expectations, showed that achievement in Reading remained very high, with 100% achieving age-related expectations both last year & the previous year. Considerable improvement was made in Writing from 40% the previous year, to 70%. (This had been a focus for improvement). Achievement in Maths was up from 80% the previous year, to 90%. 4. Progress of our disadvantaged pupils- Internal tracking: (Expected Progress is measured as 6 steps progress from the end of the previous academic year, or 1 step for each short term if they transferred to St Katharine’s during the year)
The data showed that the percentage of our disadvantaged pupils making expected progress in Reading had increased from 80% the previous year, to 94.1%. In Writing it was up from 70% the previous year, to 82.4%. In Maths, the percentage of pupils was similar; 90% the previous year, 88.2% in the academic year ending 2024. 5. Attendance of our disadvantaged pupils in the academic year 2023-2024
The data showed that the percentage of disadvantaged pupils with persistent absence fell slightly from 30% the previous year to 23.5%. (This figure would be 11.8% if calculated without the two pupils with extenuating circumstances.) 5. Our evaluation of the approaches delivered last academic year indicate that:
Based on all the information above, the performance of our disadvantaged pupils met our expectation, and we are at present on course to achieve the outcomes we set out to achieve by 2024-2025, as stated in the Intended Outcome section above. |
Externally provided programmes
Programme |
Provider |
Counselling |
Spurgeons (formerly Fegans) |
|
|
Service pupil premium funding (optional)
For schools that receive this funding, you may wish to provide the following information:
Details |
|
How did you spend your service pupil premium allocation last academic year? |
N/A |
What was the impact of that spending on service pupil premium eligible pupils? |
N/A |
Further information (optional)
|